GSP Counsel.
A law practice that onboards, drafts, and reviews — automatically.
Two systems for a regional law firm: an end-to-end client-onboarding automation (intake form to signed engagement to paid retainer), and a drafting intelligence that reviews contracts clause by clause.
Interactive demo — drive it yourself
Sample data · no login required
Clause review
2 flags§9.2 Indemnification
High riskUncapped indemnity — playbook requires cap at 12 months of fees.
§12.4 Term & renewal
Review24-month auto-renewal with 90-day notice window. Firm standard is 30 days.
§7.1 Limitation of liability
ConformsMutual cap at fees paid. Conforms to playbook.
§15.3 Governing law
ConformsOntario. Conforms.
Ask the document
Pick a question below — answers cite the exact clause and page.
Suggested questions
The problem
“Hartwell & Doyle LLP, a 14-lawyer firm, was spending 60% of associate hours on first-pass contract review — and every new engagement letter took six days of partner-and-assistant back-and-forth before a client could even sign.”
Engagement profile — Hartwell & Doyle LLP*
What we built
- ▸Intake-to-cash automation: web intake form → AI-drafted engagement proposal from the firm's own templates → partner one-tap approval → auto-send
- ▸E-signature, retainer payment collection, and QuickBooks sync — no hands between signature and booked revenue
- ▸Client portal built alongside it: matter status, secure documents, one login
- ▸Drafting intelligence trained on partner-approved precedents and prior junior-lawyer drafts
- ▸Clause-by-clause contract review with chat-with-document citations (drive it above)
The results
intake → signed & paid (was 6 days)
first-pass review time
contracts reviewed per associate
*Illustrative composite of a typical engagement in this industry. Demo uses fictional sample data.
More live demos
Next step
Want Counsel for your team?
This demo took weeks, not quarters, to reach production for a real legal business. Yours starts with one call.